![]() |
Comments on this story Comments have now been closed for this article
Posted by Bodie on May 07 2008, 00:20 AM GMT Shane Warne is was always will be a genius. Had he been captain he would not have gotten into the trouble that he did, he had more sense than that. Shane is to bowling as Bradman was to batting. Look long and hard you will NEVER see the likes of him again. If he had been captain he would still be playing. On ya Warnie!!! Posted by rocky on May 06 2008, 23:16 PM GMT Warne's captaincy in the 6-7 matches of IPL is really exceptional,but that in no way can undermine the yrs of leadership of Waugh. Waugh did change the way test cricket was being played, Of course he had built a fabulous team but his man management skills were fantastic. Being the coach and the captain,a retired stalwart like warne can surely lead the minnows with unquestionable authority.they have nothing to lose. Would the aussie world class players have followed his plans?? Posted by CJC1 on May 06 2008, 15:18 PM GMT Players of Warne's rare natural ability rarely made good let alone great captains. Lara, Tendulkar, Wasim Akram, Viv Richards, to name a few recent notables who were genius players, but good captains? I don't think so! They could get unbelievable performances out of themselves and dominate every player out there. But that is not the same as getting a whole team to perform with you. Cricket is a team sport. So would Warne have been a good captain? A big maybe, and even then only in a team full of players nearly as talented as him (the Aussie side pre-ashes 05 is about his only option here for him). Anything else he would have been a captain in the mould of the players mentioned above. That is, a complete an utter failure as a captain. Posted by Governor on May 06 2008, 10:27 AM GMT Chappelli is right!! Shane Warne is an attacking captain who plays to win. Attacking captains like Ian Chappell, Mike Gatting, Sir Garfield Sobers, David Hookes, Imran Khan and Mark Taylor believed in attack being the best form of defence. CHappelli, Sir Garfield Sobers, RIchie Benaud, Les Flavell and David Hookes were entertainers and winners. They played the game to win by adopting the theory of attack being the best form of defence!! In hindsight, if Shane Warne was awarded the captaincy ahead of SR Waugh, his career bloopers may not have happened. The captaincy may have allowed him to mature as a human being more quickly due to the responsibility and privilege of being captain of Australia!! We would never know. I reckon he would have made Ricky Ponting a better captain!! Steve Waugh was a selfish captain who was more concerned about his batting average and his win-loss ratio as captain!! Posted by Dophile on May 06 2008, 08:20 AM GMT This is simple and magnificient. He has been given a modest & average players. To get the best out of them one need to know to handle man management, this is excatly what he has done. To make one beleive and perform, he has done that. He is truely leading by example. Hope to see him continue and set standards for others to follow, it's a great opportunity for him to show the world, what they have missed of him when playing for his country. - Keep it going Warneeeeee & Royals.... Best of Luck with the Success Posted by bigyanmihir on May 06 2008, 06:16 AM GMT No wonder that Shane Warne, the greatest living bowler of the cricket ball, is being lionised on his achievements as the captain of Rajasthan Royals IPL team. Winning a game of cricket is about taking 20 wickets in a test match. There is a difference between skillful bowlers and clever bowlers. Shane Warne has both skill and cunningness. Like a chess player he planned his great opponents' fall. The famous dismissal of Mike Gatting is an example of this aspect. He always had smile for his conquerers - a smile of genuine appreciation. In the famous 'desert storm' in Sharjah, Warne was decimated by another legendary cricketer, Sachin Tendulkar. He accepted the ruling of the Master ever so graciously with a smile and a clap of appreciation for a six or a century here and there. That was because he knew and appreciated the craftsmanship of the batsman who conquered him like a true professional. Share Warne could have been the longest serving and the greatest captains of the game. Posted by ErnestHemingway on May 06 2008, 06:08 AM GMT I totally agree with what NikkonCric said. Anyone I mean anyone can lead a team full of geniuses like Sachin, Brett Lee, Yuvraj, Dhoni, Pullock, Hayden, Hussy and all the others but the best leader is he who leads average players ,inculcates in them the virtues of hardwork,dedication,team spirit and then motivates them and brings out the best in them and then leads them by example to victory-that is shane warne for u. I added lines by Nikkon which I couldn't say any better. And I for one hope Shane Warne team wins this tournament they deserve it. All other teams are full of themselves with likes of HEORS in them but Real MAN is Warne. Remember what the wicketkeeper said when he won the MOTM award Asodkar? My captain faith and believe inspired me. Believe and Faith in someone can do wonders. And Warne believes in every player on his team. Lastly, he is a fighter in every aspect of the game. Cricket is out team play not INDIVIDUAL STARS who are bought for MILLIONS. Posted by MMHS on May 06 2008, 04:07 AM GMT I believe, it was not Shane's personal life (I don't fancy ChappelI or Rickey were that good boy), rather than his relationship with some ACB officials, that didn't allow him to be statistically the greatest Captain in the history of the game. When I look back & think what this outstanding Aussie team achieved under 2 of the most boring & negative captains in their history (Sorry Steve, Shane wouldn't have allowed India to win Eden Test & Rickey, you were simply outclassed in Ashes 05, by Michel, though Australia was a much better team & had a wizard taking 40 scalps. You know, this Aussie team leaves little scope for others, but whenever someone came to challenge, neither Steve nor Rickey could impress). I believe similar was the case with Miller, who was not the best of Bradman's friends. The enthusiasm that Shane could generate in a 50 over game or the passion still he is showing after retirement, in a 20 over game at nearly 40, I wonder what we have lost in a 5 day thriler Posted by Paullie on May 05 2008, 22:31 PM GMT I agree completely with Mr Chappell - Warne is a tactical genius and an inspirational leader. Unfortunately he's also a collossal bogan. And there's more to being a captain than just winning matches. And that's something the alternative choice did at a better rate than anyone else in Australian history. Posted by Shefali on May 05 2008, 19:40 PM GMT Shane Warne has always been my favourite cricketer and as said he would have probably be one of the greatest captains Australia ever had. Unfortunately due to off field activities the world missed out on a an art of captaincy. Hope he watch him player Poker in Vegas
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||
|